Software Quality Assurance Practice Exam

Is it true or false that inspections and walkthroughs are code-oriented human testing methods?

1. True

2. False

The correct answer is: True

The statement that inspections and walkthroughs are code-oriented human testing methods is true. Inspections and walkthroughs are both techniques used in software quality assurance to review and evaluate software artifacts, which often include code, design documents, requirement specifications, and test cases. Inspections involve a formal process where a trained facilitator leads a group of reviewers through the examination of the code or documentation. The primary aim is to identify defects, improve quality, and ensure compliance with coding standards or project requirements. This method emphasizes collaboration among team members to provide a thorough examination, which directly aligns with the goal of scrutinizing the code carefully. Walkthroughs, on the other hand, are more informal and involve the author of the code or document presenting their work to peers. This method allows for discussion and understanding of the material, providing an opportunity for immediate feedback. While walkthroughs may not be as structured as inspections, they still focus on the code or development artifacts, as participants analyze the author's implementation and approach. Both of these methods rely heavily on human judgement and expertise, emphasizing the evaluation of code and related documentation to ensure quality and identify potential defects early in the development cycle. This human involvement is integral to their effectiveness as tools for verifying quality in software development.